Thursday, June 13, 2024

Exploring Resistance in Modern Consumer Culture: Advertising, Promotional Culture, and the Limits of Consumer Autonomy | Analysis & Insights

 Introduction

Businesses in various realms of the economy are increasingly becoming global.  The development is attributed to the advancement of the technology.  Technology has changed the dynamics of the world, where it has made it smaller. Therefore, it is not only accessible to international companies but also the small and medium companies that are taking advantage of the new business opportunities.  However, for these businesses to enter new markets and be competitive, they need to formulate a firm and good advertising strategy.  Well for starters, if an organization aims to become successful, it is a prerequisite to adapt to a new social culture environment. Consequently, an organization must manage to maintain its visibility and efforts to prosper as a profit-making enterprise. In other words, organizations should have profound insights regarding different cultures. The context is achievable through well-planned advertising and promotional culture.

The cultural values are the fundamentals of the consumer's understanding of consumption. Since advertising is passed through various forms of communication, it is expected to reflect the culture of the intended recipients. Research has indicated that culture is a weapon that defines the success or failure of a business brand. The advertising and promotional personalities must adopt suitable methodologies in their line of duty, with deep knowledge of cultural influences on consumption, preferences and tastes.  The paper through the lens of theoretical perspectives, evidence and use of relevant examples, explores the possibilities and limitations of resistance confined to the argument of modern consumer culture.

 The paper has been divided into four main segments.   Segment one entails the definition of advertising and promotional culture using various theoretical frameworks such as the consumer culture theory and programmatic advertising.  The second major is on various forms of resistance such as activism and consumer boycotting of exploitative products with the use of relevant brands as examples.

 Segment three explores the delimitations that are causing resistance. Also, the segment looks into t the future of resistance.   The research on challenges will focus on components, structural constraints and commodification.  The future resistance will be based on both the modern and traditional approaches.

 The fourth and the last segment is the conclusion. The segment briefly highlights the key aforementioned points. It uses the findings to conclude the call for action and underlining future directions.

 

Adverting and promotional culture Theoretical frameworks

Promotional culture's nexus is on the observation of how advertising specialists and strategies are framed and their general influence on societies. Therefore, promotional culture can be defined as advertising that shapes not only the culture’s symbols and ideological context but also its ethos, texture and composition (Jackson, 2013).  Also, it can be defined as a system where advertising and marketing are dominating and structuring conditions in terms of political expression and power relations. 

Advertising is considered ideological irrespective of the domain.  In other words, all kinds of advertising such as the most acceptable or informative are ideological. An efficient and effective advertising must be integrated into a culture, and use the local language and values of the local audiences (Okonkwo et al. 2013). The strategy is not only to choose the sparkling international creative strategy but also employs an approach that factors in the needs of the locals, motivates and integrates habits that strongly are correlated to local buying motives even though times it does not meet the minimum international standards.   According to Demangeot et al., (2015), cross-cultural advertising purports an act of marketing a product or service to various cultures simultaneously. Donthu et al., (2021) stated that international advertising is akin to cross-cultural advertising.  Advertising on a global scale is created and coordinated from a centralized point for dissemination with or without local adaptations across many countries in the world. 

 One approach to understanding the promotional culture and advertising is by employing consumer culture theory. The theoretical framework is built on a culturally sensitive and reflective mechanism (Arnould et al., 2005). The Consumer cultural theory is further divided into various explorations. The first exploration is on consumer identity activities.  It majors on how consumers integrate and create numerous cultural resources into their original identity (Rokka, 2021). The resources play a role in the negotiation of a sense of role and spur the narrative of identification of goals. Therefore, based on the theory there is a shift in the perception of the consumers as the shapers of the cultural meanings.  However, neither the brands nor the consumers are in full control of the cultural identifications being produced.  Rokka (2021) states that for the brand to be relevant culturally, it needs to assess its role in helping consumers work through playing a central role in offering consumers resonant identity myths.   Precisely, the brands are managed to offer convincing narratives and tales of powerful negotiation of desires such as gender-based cards.  The second exploration is on the marketplace’s cultures.  It impacts the contemporary social-cultural context and surroundings within the context of consumption (Hungara et al., 2021).   The assumption is on the local cultural formations within a small-scale environment and their role in the market re-creation, consumption practices and many more practices. The role of consumer cultural theory in marketplace cultures is to conceptualize and theorize the aspect of brand community.

 The cultural consumer theory also has an exploration of the ‘sociohistorical patterning of consumption’.  The exploration of the ways macro-level frameworks and history shape the consumption and the consumer's sense of identities (Witkowski et al., 2021).  This CCT stream has resulted in more scholarly studies about social stratification such as class and gender.  The exploration of promotional culture has aided in understanding why the consumer's interaction in consumption is communal rather than being in an individual framework.  The key lessons from this CCT stream are the profound understanding of product proliferation, socially sharable practices value creation and the influence on social value.

 The last cultural customer theory exploration is the “mass-mediated marketplace ideologies and consumers interpretive strategies”.  Globalization and technology have led to the high-speed circulation of news and information (Bak et al., 2023).  Therefore, the stream sought to unpack the approaches in which the consumers consume information that includes sometimes resistance to marketing messages.   Consumers are “interpretive agents” with the ability to criticize, execute resistance, boycott and even use the available avenues to launch attacks on brands as a way of protesting or showing their dissatisfaction (Rokka, 2021). Therefore, CCT is contributing to the ongoing marketing debates that include but are not limited to standardization or localization of advertising and communication approaches.

 

 In the contemporary consumer culture amongst the important strategies is the dynamic landscape of digital advertising.  It is the effort to engage diverse audiences within different cultural backgrounds. The navigation of the intricate spectrum of programmatic advertising has revealed the desire to have a tailored culture (Kaden et al., 2023).   With promotional culture being a pressing topic in the realm of advertising, the unearthed critical ethics as such price efficiency and exploration of the roles of creatives. These subjects illuminate the multifaceted facets of programmatic advertising within a cultural set-up (Samuel et al., 2021).  In other words, the programmatic advertising landscape since is technology-driven is evolving rapidly. The advertising agency is embracing the changes by integrating AI, and first and third-party data that are central to developing a more effective and engaging campaign (Cooper et al., 2023).  Therefore, with globalization and technology advancements the future of pragmatic in promotional culture looks promising. The growth underscores the emergence of new opportunities for reaching and engaging with a target customer base in a private confidential world.

Notably, targeting and interaction with the customers are some of the major aspects of this framework. Unlike in the traditional media, where the targeting of the customer base faces the challenges of lacking specificity, programmatic advertising capitalizes on the power of customer data to show certain users without having the wrong precision (Kiran et al., 2020).  The data-driven is confined to both first and third-party data in the process of empowering advertising agencies to disseminate their message to the target audiences at the most appropriate time. In effect, it improves the relevance and positive impact on the entire process.

 Delving deeper into programmatic advertising within the context of promotional culture helps in understanding some of the key points that define and reveal its impactful nature. Audience segmentation ensures the advertising is confined to the right audience. Programmatic advertising uses data and insights to select the right segment based on key metrics that include demographics and any other metrics that guarantee effective engagement (Tiet, 2020).  The selection of the right audience segmentation is not possible without the utilization of the relevant data.  Therefore, data accuracy is central to this campaign. Brands need to employ qualified personnel and use reliable data sources that can correctly inform them of the targeting and bidding approaches.

 Forms of resistance

Activism

Cultural branding offers an approach in advertising in which an organization does not brand itself as a brand of customer associations but also shapes the cultural resources within a specific cultural background.    Furthermore, brand activism is an aspect of corporate social responsibility     (Moorman, 2020).  The brands create decisions that can create undertakings that are consequential and beneficial to the targeted customer base. Within the context of CSR, brands increase their visibility by focusing their effort towards a certain cause.  Precisely, within the advertising and promotional culture the focus is on the social-cultural issues.  According to Monteverde et al., (2024), brand activism entails business efforts that prevent or promote social issues to promote or curtail improvements in the communities. Therefore, social activism will target variables such as gender equality and cultural backgrounds.  The spectrum does not only intend to grab the attention and engagement of its salient key target market but works on improvements around it. In effect, it helps the brand to become competitive and profitable within a local market set-up.  Furthermore, the emotional connection and ties go beyond the price and quality of goods and services.  It is important to mention that in a situation where the activism of the brands is not in complete synchronization and matches its key metrics; it may be seen as mere advertising and public relations (Vredenburg et al., 2020).  The outcome would be customers disassociating themselves from the brand. The failed initiatives may lead to a backlash and more importantly, the customers within a particular market boycotting the product. According to Coelho et al., (2023), the outcome will be a decrease in profits and turnover, eventually, hurt the brand image and reputation.  Therefore, activism offers resistance to advertising and culture in two forms: anti-consumerist movements and counter-consumption practices. 

Over the years cultural activism has been within different doctrines such as gender movements.  It is advocating to be incorporated when formulation of the advertising decisions.  For example, when the feminist movements are fighting against the use of slender female models as the yardstick of women in advertising. Such groups can air their concern regarding sexism.  Consequently, the feminist movements have in the past been able to raise their concerns against several magazines or newspapers that have portrayed sexist adverts in the pretext of persuading more male audiences or those who prefer women who are putting more effort into maintaining a perfect body that looks attractive.  Interestingly, the resistance within the culture activism purports that individuals should be incorporated in the decision-making regarding the nature of advertisement they are likely to be affected with so that they can make a choice (Goggin et al., 2020). Furthermore, cultural activism underscores that cooperate need to consider the opinion of the public before exposing them to various advertisements.  It views marketing as socially unacceptable as the result of it interfering with public space without the consent of the public audience.  Therefore, it looks for an opportunity to change messages that are passed in numerous types of adverts.

Cultural activism aims to promote an environment that is not corporate-culture-dominated.  It is also against the concept of capitalism. In regards to this context, it purports that capitalism promotes unfairness in social stratification. Therefore, it perceives capitalism to be a hindering factor that creates discrimination in advertising and not positively enabling promotional culture. According to Rauschnabel et al.,  (2023), there is a wide utilization of inhuman behaviors and a lack of promotional culture during the promotion of advertisements.  The desire to generate more profits has resulted in the wrong formulation of advertisements to the public.

Increased competition due to globalization has forced companies to create survival strategies to remain relevant. Amongst the survival strategies is the utilization of subverts; where one of the organizations may look for approaches to disrupt the advert of the rival organization (Sandova, 2020).  It is an illegal practice where the potential customers of a particular product are misled and misinformed about the true nature of the advert. Pranking is amongst the approaches employed by the anti-consumerist movements to reduce information in international advertising (Lekakis, 2021). Therefore, the subverting objective is to draw the attention of the potential customer base to some information that may be far from the accuracy of the products advertised by a particular organization.  In nutshell, the practice purpose is to reveal the weakness of a specific organization to influence negatively purchasing decisions of a given product. For instance, a company may interfere with the advertising of a competitive company to persuade consumers to purchase its products.  

 A case study of Adbusters magazine to show activism

 One of the latest displays of cultural activism was by Adbusters magazine. The magazine came up with a signature brand of subversive lack Spot Sneaker. Nevertheless, the campaign was mainly inserted into mainstream consumerism instead of the promotion of the cultural activism movement (Ciurel, 2020). For the Adbusters magazine, they were fighting for mental environmentalism as opposed to advocating for the rights of the general public.  They were castigated for the utilization of the notion of the environmentalist. In other words, instead of fighting against external environmental pollution, the company focuses on fighting internal pollution. They operate on the notion that the minds of the citizens are polluted by the information toxin as the result of information in the public domain courtesy of advertising.  Some quarters of the public argue that their act was ‘unruly corruption. On their side, Busters that witnessed in ballooning of cases of mental illness may be caused by the many adverts that were released in the public domain. 

Precisely, the information about the oil spill by the BP organization, increased the number of animals becoming non-existence and many may be the reason for a high population of the public suffering from mental health (March, 2022). Furthermore, Adbusters argued that the media was ideal for the promotion of ideas instead of employing other advertising avenues. Notably, good mental ethics should be the priority of all the adverts rather than sales motives as is the case with most of the adverts.

 

Alternative media and mainstream media

 The main media is perceived as the hub of hegemony and full of dominant power structures.  Therefore, by giving voice to the marginalized voices and stressing the issues overlooked by the established media, alternative media serves the purpose of representing of the will of the people (Nygaard, 2020). Fundamentally, it has been difficult to define alternative media due to the wide spectrum of its approach. Also, it uses an elongated divergent in the execution of its storytelling and reporting of the news.  However, according to Brooks et al., (2021) where that maybe defining media as an alternative within a specific stage of culture may be referred to as mainstream within another cultural time and background.  Within the advertising and promotional culture, the main media actors including the customers share a common argument of a press that is not meeting the minimum threshold and therefore perceive the mainstream media as an avenue that does not represent a sufficient diversity of viewpoints.  Consequently, the act of balancing or countering such claims of underserving of established media with culturally radical content is left to the alternative media.  Notably, resistance to mainstream advertising and promotional cultures is because the general public perceives the conveyed information as not a true representation of prevailing situations or values.  Therefore, alternative media platforms provide alternative narratives and perceptions that go against the dominant consumerist ideologies. Alternative media under the community media plays the role of promoting access to all the people in the surrounding settings.  The social-oriented activities in the alternative media can be central in breaking down barriers of social stratification that are dominant in the established media.  In the recent past, many religious communities have employed alternative media to engage their subscribed members with their larger community’s set-up (Müller et al., 2-021). These media can be seen as factors with the ability to influence or maintain s specific traditions. Precisely, they inform the general public by giving descriptions of what transpired or ways to execute certain things in contemporary societies. The media has been painted as a channel that broadcasts one-point information or ideologies without resulting in activism.  Many of these kinds of media have a common purpose in the communities. They tend to empower the locals by providing means to access communication and voice for local people.  

 Media literacy

  The current digital era has witnessed increase in the advertising and promotional culture as a means of improving sales and turnover by targeting a particular market segment.    However, these activities have been facing a myriad of challenges (Breves et al., 2021).  Businesses are using advertising and promotional culture to broadcast millions of adverts daily. Therefore, the people must have advertising literacy.  Advertising literacy refers to the ability of a person to properly evaluate and comprehend persuasive information presented in the adverts (Sweeney et al., 2022).  Notably, technical all the adverts have been designed with an agenda of manipulating individuals’ emotions and beliefs.  In this review, it can result in a lack of critical thinking. Also, it can lead to a deficiency in media literacy skills among the buyers.  Thus, in this argument, individuals need to have the knowledge and understanding of the content messages that businesses pass in the adverts.  The frequent bombardment of adverts can result in desensitization of its outcome, thus increasing the degree of hardness for individuals to recognize and question the disseminated information mounted on advertisements (Segijn et al., 2022). The level of media literacy is dependent on individual knowledge and skills. According to Jones-Jang et al., (2021) an individual with scarce media literacy is considered to not have enough understanding of meanings in the media. Therefore, they tend to accept surface values without raising more questions.  On the other hand, individuals with sophisticated levels of media literacy have a deep understating of the dynamics of the media, a high level of awareness of the advert's intention and profound insights into the media industry.  Therefore, to deal with advertising and promotional culture resistance, individuals should develop media locus knowledge (Jiménez-Martínez et al., 2023). Furthermore, real-world knowledge will be effective when making decisions.  The personal locus consists of objectives and drives dimensions.  Therefore, at this level, there should be a deep understanding and analysis of strengths, limitations and options for activities integrated with the information sources spectrum to facilitate the appropriate decisions (Khalil et al., 2022). Consequently, competency and skills are classified as tools prerequisite for people to deal with varieties of media information.  Therefore, threatening media knowledge and increased awareness of media exposure will help to deal with the resistance and influence of the media.     

 Cultural resistance 

The type of resistance towards advertising and promotional culture is more of opposition that is mounted against the dominant cultural values. For instance, opposition against the undergoing of the mainstream media.  The cultural resistance is executed by using a wide range of practices to indicate consumer dissatisfaction such as using various forms of activism (West et al., 2023). Fundamentally, the resistance is confined to the act of consumerism. The customer is against adverts focusing on other issues rather than the interest of the people.  Therefore, there are questions raised in the concentration on consumption rather than human relationships and the well-being of the target customers. The adverts are seen as a means for the companies to seek for material possessions and the well-being of the symbols.  Therefore, it is usually upon the cultural strategies to use the form of the subversive approaches (Malefyt et al., 2020). These approaches are used for the disruptions and challenging of the dominant factor of advertising and promotional culture. Some of the examples of the subverting used by the cultural resistance include but are not limited to changing the adverts o harbor different kinds of messages, identifying the exploitative approaches that are used the corporations to lure the consumers to increase their sales and eventually surge in profits. The aim of subverting is usually the reclamation of the public space. Also, it is usually too focused on challenging the way corporations are commercializing culture (Ferrucci et al., 2024). Therefore, the resistance groups ensure their success, they have to conduct a deep subverting of the advertising imagery and slogans.  Cultural resistance can be carried out both at the individual and collective levels. At the collective level, it involves the organization of activist interactions to challenge the dominant power of corporations. The activities target the promotion of social justice. Therefore, it is imperative to understand that cultural resistance activities are pushed towards creating awareness for the general public on corporate exploitation and ensuring there is affirmative action that is employed against the culture of commercialism (Airoldi et al., 2022).  For instance, they have been activist based on femininity against the issue of female representation.  In the advertising and promotional culture, the female gender for a long time has been against the stereotypes, favoring men and lack of objection, Therefore, the resistance is aimed at ensuring that there is equal inclusion and more objectives in promoting identities in the promotional culture. Therefore, it is important to note that cultural resistance is a wide and dynamic aspect that tries to combat the issues of dominance in the advertising and promotional culture.

A case study of subvertisers international

 In 2018, the organization was based in North America and part of Europe took action in 28 cities based in these nations.  Its groups globally increased visibility to one another and shared ideas based on actions. They lament how corporate power influences their lives in one way or another (Lekakis, 2021). The group further stated that advertisement goes beyond selling products to them to shape their expectations of the production of meaning in their lives.  Furthermore, they wanted to stop this advertising so that they could create a future beyond consumerism.  Some of their cause of action include advertising a backup where they advise their members to cover corporate advertising with unwritten and encourage people to write their dissatisfaction on them (Leal-Rico, 2024).  Another cause of action was taking a photo of an ad that they deemed offensive.  The members were advised to state their position and post it on social media platforms especially Twitter using the hashtag ‘#SubvertTheCity’. The group members were also encouraged to write a short article and push it to the local newspaper.

 

             

Conclusion

In conclusion, unlike advertising which entails practices aimed at boosting the performance of goods and services through promotion; promotional culture is the collection of activities such as marketing, and public relations inter alia purposely to promote society, ideas and companies. Notably, different cultures have unique value systems and languages.  The promotional and advertising must reflect the cultural attributes, social organization and the political well-being of a specific market. therefore, from the findings, it can be alluded that though the promotional culture and advertising have been perming exceptions there are also some levels of resistance based on various factors. The forms of resistance such as activism, cultural resistance and media literacy are seeking to end the dominance and consumerism that affect the general public.  The objective of the customers is to make sure corporate culture is curtailed and replaced with a consumer culture that respects the public space.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Airoldi, M. and Rokka, J., 2022. Algorithmic consumer culture. Consumption Markets & Culture25(5), pp.411-428.

Arnould, E.J. and Thompson, C.J., 2005. Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of consumer research31(4), pp.868-882.

Bak, M. and Sollwedel, K.H., 2023. Consumer Valhalla: a case study on the phenomenon of the SHEIN consumer.

Breves, P., Liebers, N., Motschenbacher, B. and Reus, L., 2021. Reducing resistance: The impact of nonfollowers’ and followers’ parasocial relationships with social media influencers on persuasive resistance and advertising effectiveness. Human Communication Research47(4), pp.418-443.

Ciurel, D., 2020. CULTURE JAMMING. Professional Communication and Translation Studies, (13), pp.26-30.

Coelho, R., Jayantilal, S. and Ferreira, J.J., 2023. The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management30(4), pp.1535-1560.

Cooper, D.A., Yalcin, T., Nistor, C., Macrini, M. and Pehlivan, E., 2023. Privacy considerations for online advertising: A stakeholder’s perspective to programmatic advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing40(2), pp.235-247.

Demangeot, C., Broderick, A.J. and Craig, C.S., 2015. Multicultural marketplaces: New territory for international marketing and consumer research. International Marketing Review32(2), pp.118-140.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N. and Lim, W.M., 2021. Research constituents, intellectual structure, and collaboration patterns in Journal of International Marketing: An analytical retrospective. Journal of International Marketing29(2), pp.1-25.

Goggin, G. and Soldatić, K., 2022. Automated decision-making, digital inclusion and intersectional disabilities. New Media & Society24(2), pp.384-400.

Ferrucci, P. and Schauster, E.E., 2024. Keeping up with the boundaries of advertising: Paradigm repair after pepsi's big mess. Journal of Communication Inquiry48(2), pp.185-204.

Hungara, A. and Nobre, H., 2021. A consumer culture theory perspective of the marketplace: An integrative review and agenda for research. International Journal of Consumer Studies45(4), pp.805-823.

Jackson, S., 2013. Reflections on communication and sport: On advertising and promotional culture. Communication & Sport1(1-2), pp.100-112.

Jiménez-Martínez, C. and Edwards, L., 2023. The promotional regime of visibility: Ambivalence and contradiction in strategies of dominance and resistance. Communication and the Public8(1), pp.14-28.

Jones-Jang, S.M., Mortensen, T. and Liu, J., 2021. Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American behavioral scientist65(2), pp.371-388.

Kadeni, K., Rony, Z.T., Rosid, A., Syakhrani, A.W. and Amer, M.A.B., 2023. DYNAMICS OF DIGITAL MARKETING HR MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE STRATEGY IN INDONESIA'S DIGITAL ERA BUSINESS: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW. International Journal of Economic Literature1(2), pp.150-162.

Kiran, K.U. and Arumugam, T., 2020, December. Role of programmatic advertising on effective digital promotion strategy: A conceptual framework. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1716, No. 1, p. 012032). IOP Publishing.

Khalil, A., Shankar, A., Bodhi, R., Behl, A. and Ferraris, A., 2022. Why do people resist drone food delivery services? An innovation resistance theory perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

Lekakis, E.J., 2021. Adversaries of advertising: anti-consumerism and subvertisers’ critique and practice. Social Movement Studies20(6), pp.740-757.

Leal-Rico, I., 2024. From grassroots to global action: The role of DIY subvertising in the European citizens’ initiative to# BanFossilAds. DIY, Alternative Cultures & Society2(1), pp.3-19.

Malefyt, T.D. and Moeran, B., 2020. Introduction: advertising cultures–advertising, ethnography and anthropology. In Advertising cultures (pp. 1-33). Routledge.

March, L., 2022. “You Say You’re Anti-Capitalist… Yet You Earn a Living!”: Teenage Stepdad and the Memeification of Culture Jamming.

Monteverde, G., Runfola, A. and Cova, B., 2024. Activist entrepreneurship for a sustainable future: an integrative framework. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, pp.1-26.

Moorman, C., 2020. Commentary: Brand activism in a political world. Journal of public policy & marketing39(4), pp.388-392.

Müller, P. and Schulz, A., 2021. Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co. Information, Communication & Society24(2), pp.277-293.

Nygaard, S., 2020. Boundary work: Intermedia agenda-setting between right-wing alternative media and professional journalism. Journalism Studies21(6), pp.766-782.

Okonkwo, I., Mujinga, J., Namkoisse, E. and Francisco, A., 2023. Localization and Global Marketing: Adapting Digital Strategies for Diverse Audiences. Journal of Digital Marketing and Communication3(2), pp.66-80.

Rauschnabel, P.A., Babin, B.J., tom Dieck, M.C., Krey, N. and Jung, T., 2022. What is augmented reality marketing? Its definition, complexity, and future. Journal of business research142, pp.1140-1150.

Rokka, J., 2021. Consumer Culture Theory’s future in marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice29(1), pp.114-124.

Samuel, A., White, G.R., Thomas, R. and Jones, P., 2021. Programmatic advertising: An exegesis of consumer concerns. Computers in Human Behavior116, p.106657.

Sandoval, M., 2020. Entrepreneurial activism? Platform cooperativism between subversion and co-optation. Critical Sociology46(6), pp.801-817.

Segijn, C.M. and Van Ooijen, I., 2022. Differences in consumer knowledge and perceptions of personalized advertising: Comparing online behavioural advertising and synced advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications28(2), pp.207-226.

Sweeney, E., Lawlor, M.A. and Brady, M., 2022. Teenagers’ moral advertising literacy in an influencer marketing context. International Journal of Advertising41(1), pp.54-77.

Tiet, T., 2020. The planning and implementation process of programmatic advertising campaigns in emerging markets (Master's thesis).

Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A. and Kemper, J.A., 2020. Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing?. Journal of public policy & marketing39(4), pp.444-460.

West, E. and McAllister, M.P. eds., 2023. The Routledge companion to advertising and promotional culture. Routledge.

Witkowski, T.H. and Otnes, C., Annamma Joy 2021. Professor of Marketing, The University of British Columbia, Canada.“Consumer Culture Theory in Asia presents chapters from active researchers who address Asian consumption from a rich variety of historical and theoretical perspectives. Their work will engage the.

                                                                                                              

Friday, June 7, 2024

Media Regulation Frameworks: Balancing Media Freedom, Public Interests, and Controlling Media Oligopolies

 

Abstract

Media industries play an integral role in the life of the modern world. The vast of the population perceives media as not only a source of entertainment but, also information. Because of their critical role, media for the longest period has attracted the attention of policy-makers. Therefore, this essay aims to evaluate how media regulation frameworks are premised on protecting media freedom, and public interests among others through limiting media oligopolies. The essay argues that media regulation especially limiting media oligopolies has impacted positively on the democratization of media. It facilitates more media outlets that further facilitate to divergent viewpoints consumed by the general public.

  The essay will discuss media regulation. It is enforced by the laws and policies of a particular country.  Their existence is on the grounds of protection of freedom of speech and independence of media. The regulation is in the forms of self-regulation, statutory regulation and co-regulation.  Further, it discusses the democratization of media and its implications in Australia with the aid of comparative analysis using an information privacy policy in the USA.  The essay concludes that it is imperative to formulate media regulations that safeguard the freedom of the press by promoting divergent views.

Introduction

Social media as an avenue for disseminating and acquisition of information is increasingly becoming popular in the contemporary world as opposed to the mainstream media. According to the study by Statista Research Department (2024), there are an estimated 21.3 million active social media subscribers in Australia. Albeit the fact that the majority of the Australian population is embracing social media as a source of information, recently conducted research has indicated that more than half of the population does not trust news and information from this source (Wilding et al., 2018).

Independent and free press is salient in enabling information flows between the citizens and authorities. Democratic countries such as Australia have profoundly recognized that disseminating information is significant in upholding liberal and democratic societies. However, with press freedom, it raises the question of meeting fundamental standards such as fairness and accuracy. The matter has led to extensive debate locally and internationally on media regulation and the form it should take. Notably, the role of media is instrumental in realizing and exercising the right to protect freedom of expression, however, media regulation frameworks are premised on protecting media freedom, and public interests among others through limiting media oligopolies.

The paper is divided into three parts. Part, one focuses on defining media regulation citing cross-media ownership policy. It covers the evolution and its implications in Australia with the aid of different forms of media regulation. The second part is the critique of media regulation.  The paper evaluates how regulation has succeeded in democratizing media access. It further builds on the democratizing of media by discussing on conflict between regulation and freedom of speech. The argument is cemented by the use of a case study. 

 The third part is the comparative analysis that dives into details of the current media regulatory framework in Australia. The comparison between Australian and USA media regulations plays an instrumental in indicating the distinction and their effectiveness. The fourth and concluding part is the conclusion that encompasses the recap of the main points and gives implications on the paper’s findings on future media regulation laws and policies.

 

Media regulation

The framework is instrumental in the limitation of media oligopolies since it defines the path of democratization of media. Furthermore, it enables a diversification of the political and social opinions that give voice to the minority populations. Also, is a vital aspect in the development country’s key values such as language and culture.  In other words, the rationale of the media regulation in limiting media oligopolies enhances the ability to use media for the people-formation. Therefore, it forms the fundamental of cultural identity, rights to public participation formulated with individual’s association with media concerns on the impact on the minority population and media failure especially on the global space. 

Within a media oligopoly’s structure, the dominance of the market by a few large firms significantly controls the flow of information. In other words, they act as the only source of information hence impacting and shaping public opinion (Chung et al., 2022). About this argument, in 2017, the Australian government proposed a relaxation of strict cross-media ownership policies and laws. The new rules prohibit a common ownership or control of either TV, radio or newspaper in a particular area (Wilding et al., 2020).  Thus, it aims to encourage more operators to take advantage of the expansion of new markets.  The development is due to the acknowledgement of the digital porous and competitive global environment.  The proponents of changes in laws argue that it unfairly restricts local media enterprises from optimizing the scale and scope of their undertaking and also the ability to access fundamental requisites to be competitive globally.

 Notably, in Australia, the evolution of media has been shaped by globalization and technological advancements. The changes and reviews have included changes in various media control rules as such cross-media ownership rules. In a few words, the media regulation in Austria involved the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (BSA ACT) which focuses on the censorship and preservation of cultural values (Grisold and Presold, 2020). In other words, the policy aimed to solidify the country's ability to regulate and monitor the broadcasting realm.

 The second aspect of evolution is the licensing of broadcasting. Under the BSA Act, the policy initiates activities to develop co-regulatory conditions. The broadcasters were operating under regulated conditions and environments.  With online content becoming popular, the authority recognized the need to regulate online and digital content.  The Enhancing Online Safety Policy of 2015 draws on the national cultural code to regulate prevented digital content (Wilding et al., 2021). Finally, prevention and content regulation make the contemporary evolution of media restriction in Australia.  The policy provides the framework to report online crimes and ban negative online content.

 Media regulation being a wider realm encompasses various forms such as content regulation and access regulation.  On one hand, content regulation includes broadcasting threshold and classification of content.  Consequently, the content regulation's primary objective is to influence the disseminated content to the audiences (Chapdelaine et al., 2021). In effect, it shapes the public view and cultural values. On the other hand, access regulation entails frequency allocation and digital neutrality. While frequency allocation impacts the equal distribution and accessibility of resources by all broadcasters, digital reality impacts creating a neutral ground for all websites and internet users (Spindler, 2020). In effect, it ensures there is equal online innovation and competition.

 Rationale on the media regulation

The democratization of media in Australia has faced a myriad of challenges. Nevertheless, the efforts in conjunction with government policies have been successful to a greater extent. One of the areas where the democratization of media has extensively succeeded is in the public interest. Efforts to resolve media oligopolies were pinned on the argument that public interest would be best in the situation whereby there is a diversification of views (Winseck  ,  2021). The act of watering down cross-media ownership policy was poised to ensure diverse views through diversified ownership of licenses. Also, it impacts on the general public welfare and the ability of the public to have insights on the latest developments. Consequently, the public interest does not include only public safety and well-being but also national security.  The correlation between these variables draws the arguments of journalist ethics. According to the UNHR, the best approach to address the ethical dimension of journalists on matters of public interest is through the adaptation of a human rights-based approach (Sonnenberge et al., 2022). Thus, the ethical duty should involve engaging in a balancing analysis.

Although media regulation has been a success, from time to time there is an emergency of conflict with the freedom of the press.  The government-led initiatives are capable of undermining the independence of media. When independent media is fully controlled by the government on the grounds of national security it underscores the concern of journalism integrity (Hong et al., 2024). This has been the case with a good number of authorities citing the context of national security. Also, the government media regulation bodies can use the regulation laws and policies to influence the information content to shape public opinion and surpass any criticism from journalists. The conflict between media regulation and independence of the press is increasingly becoming difficult to create an equilibrium. For example, within the paradigm of the New York Times, the issues of press independence were handled in a manner that indicates a high level of journalism ethics (Muller and Birnbauer). Therefore, to minimize the risk of executing unjustified and harmful manner, the media house sought advice from various security organs. By doing so, the editorial allowed the state agency to interfere with its editorial independence by voting them to offer advice on what is correct to publish.

 A case study of anti-terror laws and the Australian government indicates the conflict between media regulation and the independence of the press.  The situation unraveled various ethical and legal issues as the result of the cases in 2001, in which, the Australian, a newspaper publisher, revealed to the general public the counterterrorism operation that led to smoke out and apprehended of various militias linked with al-Shabaab, a terrorist group based in Somalia (Stewart et al., 2009). The police accused the newspaper of publishing information before the occurrence of the raiding undertakings. The editor of the paper, on the other hand, justified their action by claiming they gave the police a chance to vet information before its publication and had to wait for several days. Furthermore, the auditor purported that, the act of requiring the police to vet before publication was a ‘highly unusual practice’.   The Australian paper praised its action citing the willingness of the paper to practice responsible reporting and maintaining a high code of ethics. Therefore, the aspect of withholding information from publication while seeking clarification from the authorities challenged the principle of press independence.  The case study is a clear example of where media and authorities are willing to cooperate when facing an issue of national security.

The balance between government control and independence of the press has disadvantages outweighing the advantages. Excessive control of media by the government undermines democracy and governance. With a lack of democracy and governance, the public is at risk of not accessing diverse viewpoints. Furthermore, the government will not be held accountable in matters of national interest. Furthermore, the introduction of convenorship and intimidation of journalists plays a key role in undermining the integrity of journalists.

Comparison analysis

 In Australia, just like many other countries worldwide, the use of social media as a source and channel for conveying information is becoming more popular. Thus, the digital realm forms the fundamentals of the current media framework. The framework is confined under the online content regulation. Some of the digital services that are regulated include built not limited to websites and social media platforms (Frosio et al., 2023). These services are required to comply with content standards and other grouping requirements. Since it operates under the Broadcasting Services Act, the digital vendors are required to implement mechanisms that will ensure sanity on the internet such as restriction of the harmful content (Bahl et al., 2020). The online content regulation regulatory majors on privacy and security. The parameters are further divided into four key concepts breach of privacy, data protection, trespass and surveillance. The Privacy Act 1988, defines the principal aspect of the legislation that protects the handling of individual information on the personal level. It includes activities such as the gathering of data, usage of data, storage and also matters data disclosure of individual information in the government public sector and also within the private spectrum.

 In the comparison analysis, the essay uses A case study of USA information privacy laws. The information privacy law in the USA is guided by the Privacy Act 5 U.S.C. (2006) which provides the regulation of information handling by the federal organs (Moira Paterson). 

The law stipulates that the federal organ must ‘collect information to the greatest extent practicable directly from the subject individual when the information may result in adverse determinations about an individual’s rights, benefits, and privileges under Federal programs’ (Moira Paterson, pg 27). Also, there is a clause within the policy that prevents any chances of maintenance of records and in the process, it is described as guaranteed by the law unless it conflicts with authorized law enforcement undertakings.

 Both Australia and USA information privacy law, laws have similarities to a greater extent. They have stipulated the mechanisms of collecting and gathering personal information belonging to an individual. In effect, they promote freedom of speech and press. This is in line with media regulation on media oligopolies that aims to create divergent viewpoints from the general public               (Pisarkiewicz et al., 2021). With federal agencies through policies allowing more and encouraging more media, especially in the digital space, the freedom of the press and working as an independent body will guarantee a proper and acceptable manner of handling private information.

The paper alludes that based on policies and approaches, Australia has the best approach to dealing with the democratization of media. the combination of the news laws making a relaxation on the cross-media ownership policy and information privacy law forms a strong fundamental to dealing with control of the flow of information. By allowing new entrants in the media industry there is the creation of divergent views that impact positively on shaping public opinion and to some extent cultural values. 

 Conclusion

Australia's federal agency is working towards empowering more media to venture into existing and new markets to address the concern of market oligopolies. The arguments towards media oligopolies are that they hinder divergent views hence obstructing the freedom of speech/press

 The essay findings also indicate that the media industry is shaping towards digital platforms. Unlike traditional media, digital media can reach a wider audience, hence the need for more resources to be competitive in the global arena.  Therefore, the media regulation to ensure internet service providers are not practising favours will ensure equality in digital services such as social media and websites.   Therefore, the essay concludes that the media regulation frameworks are formulated to promote public interest and its achievable by limiting the existence of media oligopolies.

 The findings indicate that federal agency needs to create well-thought policies that will protect and not hinder the well-being of digital users. Policies such as the information privacy policy though it targets to protect the public interest can result in conflict between the federal state and the press independence. In a nutshell, the dynamics of information consumption and dissemination should be the key guidance in the formulation of new policies. The democratization of media will not be fully realized without a strong working relationship between the federal agency and the media outlets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Bahl, V. S., Rahman, F., Bailey, R., Krishnan, S., Deo, S., & Sontakke, N. (2020). Internet intermediaries and online harms: Regulatory.

 

Chapdelaine, P., & McLeod Rogers, J. (2021). Contested Sovereignties: States, Media Platforms, Peoples, and the Regulation of Media Content and Big Data in the Networked Society. Laws10(3), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10030066

Chung, M., & Wihbey, J. (2022). Social media regulation, third-person effect, and public views: A comparative study of the United States, the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Mexico. New Media & Society, 146144482211229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221122996

Frosio, G., & Geiger, C. (2023). Taking fundamental rights seriously in the Digital Services Act's platform liability regime. European Law Journal29(1-2), 31-77.

 

Grisold, A., & Preston, P. (2020). Economic Inequality and News Media. Oxford University Press.

Hong, M. S. S. K. (2024) Government Influence on the Press in Democracies, Journalists’ Perception of the Influence, and the Media Environment

Moira Paterson, THE PUBLIC PRIVACY CONUNDRUM –  ANONYMITY AND THE LAW IN AN ERA OF MASS SURVEILLANCE, week 8 reading

Muller and Birnbauer, THE ETHICS OF REPORTING NATIONAL SECURITY MATTERS, week 9 reading

Pisarkiewicz, A., & Polo, M. (2021). Old and new media: the interactions of merger control and plurality regulation. In Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy (pp. 54-74). Edward Elgar Publishing.

 

 

Spindler, G. (2020). Role and Liability of Online Platforms Providing Digital Content and Digital Services – Some Preliminary Thoughts, Including Impact of the Digital Content Directive –. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3550354

Statista Research Department, T. text provides general information S. assumes no liability for the information given being complete or correct D. to varying update, & Statistics Can Display More up-to-Date Data Than Referenced in the. (2024, January 10). Topic: Social media in Australia. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/8628/social-media-in-australia/

Sonnenberg, S., Mason, L., Lim, Y., & Reddi, T. (2022). Towards a Human Rights-Based Approach to New and Emerging Technologies. Policy Paper Series on New and Emerging Digital Technologies and Human Rights.

 

Stewart, Cameron, & Wilson, L. (2009, June 21). The Holsworthy Barracks Plot: A Case Study of an Al-Shabab Support Network in Australia. Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. https://ctc.westpoint.edu/the-holsworthy-barracks-plot-a-case-study-of-an-al-shabab-support-network-in-australia/

Wilding, D. (2021). Regulating News and Disinformation on Digital Platforms. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy9(2), 11–46. https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v9n2.415

Wilding, D., Fray, P., Molitorisz, S., & McKewon, E. (2018). The impact of digital platforms on news and journalistic content. Digital Platforms Inquiry.

Wilding, D., Giotis, C., & Molitorisz, S. (2020). Submission to Australian Communications and Media Authority-Impartiality and Commercial Influence in Broadcast News, Discussion Paper. Impartiality and Commercial Influence in Broadcast News, Discussion Paper.

Winseck, D. (2021). Media and internet concentration in Canada, 1984–2020.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Conflict Between the Early Stuart Kings and Parliament: A Historical Analysis

  THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE EARLY STUARTS KINGS AND PARLIAMENT         The Stuarts are recognized as the first kings of the U.K. Among th...