Tuesday, August 13, 2024

Role of Trade in the World’s Recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic

 

Introduction


Should governments have restricted trade to enhance domestic supply of personal protective equipment during the Covid-19 pandemic?

During the early days of the coid-19 outbreak there were massive disruptions in the supply chain that caused a global shortage in the supply of protective equipments. Countries like china which are huge exporters of the products like surgical masks, respirators, gloves and hospital gowns reduced exports and also began importing. The United States also having major companies that supply these products worldwide also began experiencing shortages. Notably, many companies resorted to their domestic supplies to meet the rising demand of the medical products due to the increasing number of Covid 19 patients (Bown, 22). Most developing countries did not have many established manufacturers to produce this product since they initially relied on imports. Hence, medical research companies, private investors and the government had to develop the medical equipments locally by combining resources. The post Covid 19 period indicates that many nations across the world have increased their production capabilities in the medical field and hence domestic supply almost meets the demand. Therefore, during the Covid 19 period governments should have adopted restricted trade to meet their demand.

Notably, trade restriction, specifically in personal protective gears would have ensured that the major exporting countries like chain and United States would meet their local demand. On the other hand, the restriction would have enabled countries that import such products to develop their manufacturing capabilities to meet their demand. It is evident that the Covid 19 period influenced numerous policy making decisions across the world, majorly because the pandemic had significant social and economic impacts. This was a necessary measure to boost the supply of the medical equipments because major suppliers like china did not have the capacity to export. The corona virus began in Wuhan china, and the outbreak became a huge health concern that the country had to shut down some parts of the economy (Magablesh, 2021). The rising numbers of causality meant that the country could not export the personal protective equipment (PPE) as usually. Nations that dependence on china had to find alternative sources of supply, but the supply chain network for the PPE was significantly affected when the virus spread across the world. Therefore, an effective measure that some nations took included promoting local production. There nations that adopted trade restrictions in as way of promoting domestic supply and also because they could not get enough supplies from the international markets.

“China monthly export and import volumes of PPEs (million kgs) from 2018 – 2020”

Covid affected the international markets for PPEs adversely, for example china imported more than it exported which led to a huge disruption in supply chain networks. As per the figures above china exported plummeted in February 2020 which mimicked a similar seasonal reduction that occurred in 2018 which was associated to the Chinese Lunar Year. Notably, this is a huge i9ndication that the Covid 19 pandemic was enough justification for governments to adopt restricted trade to promote domestic supply both in the pandemic period and after (Bown, 2022). This could help countries cushion themselves against shortages of PPEs that come about due to supply chain disruption that occur due to pandemics. The development of the domestic manufatciri9ng sector due to governments adopting restricted trade in the production of PPE is also essential in economic recovery.

Is re-shoring the best approach to deal with shocks like Covid-19 or similar events?

Nations across the world have adopted off-shoring as s trade strategy whereby they move migrate manufacturing plants from developed economies to developing or underdeveloped economies. The aim is usually to enjoy the low cost production whereby they get to enjoy cheap labour, availability of raw materials and lower production cost. Notably, this was an effective trend up until the covid-19 pandemic occurred. The interruption of trade supply chain networks were adversely affected due to lockdowns, trade restrictions and partially closure of businesses. This meant that nations could not even get their product that they have produced in other nations, hence leading to shortages while the demand continued to increase (Vaughn & Weldzius, 2021). Notably, Covid 19 disruption in the supply chain networks has led many nations to rethink this trend, and the result is that some nations have begun re-shoring their manufacturing plants that have been offshore. The occurrence of the Covid pandemic exposed major vulnerabilities in the supply chain system, and this is because the effects touched on many nations. Hence, this is wake up call for nations in terms of policy making and preparedness for unexpected shocks of any magnitude.

Re-shoring is a response to the possible vulnerabilities that exists in global supply chain systems; hence it is an effective government policy that can get implemented to help in absorbing future economic shocks. The initiates can vary in nature, for example, re-shoring can include provision of information, and technical advice to organizations. It can also include provision of financial assistance to the re-shoring exercise, for instance, subsidies, tax credits and reduction of statutory deduction imposed on organizations. This is an approach that is effective and has been effectively utilized by some nations and the results have been encouraging. A look at the Germany’s industrie 4.0 initiative indicates that it is designed to develop and strengthen the domestic manufacturing sector (Magablesh, 2021). This program indirectly promotes off shoring, hence this proves that re-shoring is an effective approach that nations can adopt to enable economic recovery in the post Covid period. It is also a good policy to prepare nations for any economic shocks and supply chain disruption similar to the resulting effect of covid-19 pandemic.

There are many reasons that can make a country adopt the re-shoring policy, but the major one is the vulnerabilities in the supply chain network. Off shoring leads to overreliance on some trading partners, hence when a disruption occurs, the nations get affected significantly (De Ruyter, 2020). Re-shoring promotes diversification in the domestic market, hence there reduced reliance on external trade partners. It also ensures that the supply chain networks are shorter, unlike when a country has off shored most of its major manufacturing industries. Notably, a shorter supply chain implies reduced vulnerability and in the case of an economic shock, it is easier for the government to navigate because the government is only dealing with domestic trade partners (Vaughn & Weldzius, 2021). Studies also indicate that there is a huge correlation between the probabilities of countries adopting the re-shoring approach and the dependency on single external business partners. For instance, Japan has a high depends on countries like china, United States and Taiwan for its research and development as shown in the figure below. This explains the why there is a high supply chain vulnerability for Japan in the research and development sectors, and thus the need for off shoring.

What other policies should governments pursue to secure access to crucial medical goods during shocks?

The occurrence of the covid-19 pandemic acts as a learning moment for many governments, and this is in terms of policy development regarding supply and availability of medical equipments.  Shocks, such as Covid 19 had a large-scale effect across the world, and many nations had not prepared to meet the demand for the PPEs. There are number of polices that government can pursue to mitigate such shocks in the future.  These include increasing supplies in the strategic national stockpiles (Cohen & Van der Muelen, 2020). Medical related shocks often bring about unforeseen market failures whose immediate effect the breakdown if the supply chain system for international trade. This implies that governments will not be able to get supplies, especially PPEs to help contain the spread of viruses or bacteria. Having enough stock in the national stockpile will ensure that the medical sector get enough short-term supplies to keep the health sector sufficiently supplied before getting additional supplies. Notably, this should be part of the preparedness strategy that the government needs to make it a policy. Projection could be used determine the amount of supply to be kept as stockpile, for example, is 30% of Americans become ill with influenza, there would be a need to about 3.5 billion N95 respirators. The PPEs in the national stockpile should be effectively maintained to reduce cases of expiry before use.

Notably, another major policy that government need to adopt providing incentives for the production of PPEs through the utilization of the existing technology, but encourage the development of better reusable ones. This can get attained through research, testing and design of better quality medical products to develop capacity for future production. In essence, this is a policy that empowers domestic production which ensures the increased demand is met even if the supply chain networks for international produce has been disrupted. Allowing local producers to use available technology to make the PPEs also ensures that the private investors can get enough cash flow during early stages of the manufacturing process that they can use to fund research and development. In the long run, the policy will reduce overreliance on external trade partners who cannot meet the PPEs demand due to supply chain disruptions.


References

Bown, C. P. (2022). How COVID‐19 medical supply shortages led to extraordinary trade and industrial policy. Asian Economic Policy Review17(1), 114-135.

Magableh, G. M. (2021). Supply chains and the COVID‐19 pandemic: A comprehensive framework. European Management Review18(3), 363-382.

Vaughn, A., & Weldzius, R. (2021). Reshoring Global Supply Chains.

de Ruyter, A. (2020). Reducing the fragility of our supply chains after Covid-19: time for a policy rethink.

Cohen, J., & van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (2020). Contributing factors to personal protective equipment shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventive medicine141, 106263.


How does new technology transform education in higher-education in Australia

 

Abstract

In Australia every 15 year old can access a computer at school and more than 90% uses computer for school work.  However, Australia do not do enough to engage children with STEM concepts, therefore they anticipate that digital technologies will be central to development for the skills for the future.  However, during Covid-19, lockdown forced the education system to adopt e-learning as an alternative to halted face-to-face learning. The essay develops the transformation of digital learning in Australia universities by exploring on its opportunities. They include but not limited to promotion of the technical skills, reducing costs, fostering connections, improvement feedback, booster collaboration, enhancing student fan and improving adaptability. These aspects are detailed described using online learning theories and models that include but not limited to cognitive load theory, RAT model and online collaborative learning theory. The essay recommends that in order to improve these opportunities digital learning should be implemented fully and constantly be improved in accordance to rapid changes in technology.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

One of the government researches has indicate that 46.6% of the online students completed their qualification over a period of more than half a decade compared to 76.6% for internal, face-to-face students (Stone, 2019). Higher education is significantly transformed by the growth in online learning, with ballooning number of the universities worldwide offering degrees programs in online, digital mode of learning. Australian education possesses a long history of ‘distance learning’ fundamentally offered by the regional universities.

Digital learning, an emerging technologies are impacting the education sphere deeply. This technology are transforming and enabling the paradigm shift in high education in Australia. In a broad view, technology in education is considered a bizarre problem and a conundrum. Precisely, it is central to an unbearable disturbance to education. Thus, it is difficult to amass an opposition to lure and the illusion of technology’s potentialities in the education sector. Furthermore, for the education stakeholders, technology are classified as a ubiquitous problem since it is perceived as the agent of change in society. In this review, the curriculum and schools are viewed as the inhibitor and instigators of change (Lobo et al., 2022).  . Rapid changes and emerging of digital learning in the contemporary world have resulted in intense discussion, research and myriad claims on its potentialities. This in turn has spurred the stakeholders to make statements claiming digital learning is a game changer in the transformation of the education system. This essay, therefore, is designed to help in informing the development of digital learning and their positive impact on the transformation of higher-education in Australia.

 The essay is divided into three segments. The introduction part briefly discusses the potentialities of digital technology in relation to transformation of Australian higher-education.  The segment is followed by the digital learning opportunities that further develop on the potentialities of digital technology using various relevant theories and data. The third and concluding segment highlights the key points and recommendations.

Key ideas and terms

The “e-learning” concept is classified as part of the technology movement, especially with the advanced evolution of technology in the contemporary world.  Therefore, digital learning refers to students utilizing technology as a part of the instructions in formal educational sphere (Harju et al., 2019). Australian schools are adopting the concept in their learning and teaching to enable teaching and effectively satisfy students’ needs concerning academic assessments teacher's notes, discussion forums and awarding of grades.

Digital learning theories and models help to understand the manner in which the design principles can be integrated in instructions to enhance effectiveness in learning.
Context (reasons for digital learning)

Educational technologies represent a wide range of digital tools that cut across all departments of the education system in Australia. With the advent of the 21st century, technology has been significant in enhancing quality in the education realm. Digital learning due to technology is a prerequisite for teachers to teach, students to learn and administrators to manage learning institutions. While it is salient to consider the developments of educators and schools made to the evolution of technology and it is also right to factor in its ripple effect on higher education in Australia. In addition, the outbreak of COVID-19 impacted negatively the Australian education calendar (Onyema et al., 2020). During the pandemic, schools were closed and institutions were forced to devise mitigation strategies that will combat the adverse effects of the pandemic that threaten to paralyze completely education system. Blended learning and online learning were some of the approaches that were used to ensure schooling is still going on (Burns, 2021). While digital studying required students to remain at home and learn through the digital space. Blended learning is the combination of face-to-face and online learning.  Precisely, digital learning transformed the education sector and they are expected to develop further and integrated deeply even during the post-Covid-19 era.

Issues (Educational Technologies Opportunities) 

 

Digital learning has therefore improved education in Australia in various spheres that include but are not limited:

ü  Promotion of the technical skills- the skills are necessary to navigate through the platforms and for professional success

ü  Increased collaboration and engagement – learning becoming more intense from both ends for appropriate clarification and reliant feedback

ü  New ways of learning- using modern effective ways of learning to build on student and teachers competence

ü  Changed roles of teachers and students in classroom- shift from the traditional roles to modern roles that demand more engagement and interactions from both parties.

Digital opportunities factors

Promotion of technical skills, improve efficiency and efficiency 

 The integration of digital learning in higher universities in Australia is central to the development of a myriad of skills.  Digital technology as a modern technology strives to build knowledge, understanding and skills to ensure that students succeed individually and as a team. The instructive and exciting functionalities of the digital learning form the bedrock for the promotion of technical skills. In Australia, technology skills are sharpened through a wide range of technology-related subjects that include but are not limited to technical studies, computing, and industrial arts and business studies (winter et al., 2019). The above elective subjects work collectively to achieve the outcome for technology education. Precisely, the technological solution should enable the students to have the necessary skills to navigate technological solutions to solve problems facing society. Implementation of digital tools in school impart students with technical skills expands the learning opportunities for the students. For instance, the introduction of digital learning using the cloud computing system will prompt students to understand the cloud computing technical skills to comfortably navigate through the system. On the other hand, teachers have leverage on technology to achieve high levels of productivity and efficiency. Teachers with technical technological skills can use their skills to improve the overall learning process in the classroom.  The teaching productivity is enhanced by utilization of the technological aids a prerequisite for a better planning, better and practical learning better digital resources. According to Dr. Joan Hughes, RAT model helps the teachers to self-assess their integration of technology in the classroom. Therefore, digital learning can be used as replacement, amplification or transformation undergoing in the classroom. The transformation aspects take place when the digital technology reinvents aspects of instruction, learning or curriculum in news and innovative ways.  

The technological transformation is changing the dynamics of technical skills. Unlike previously where higher schools were teaching traditional skills such as woodwork skills, students in the technological sphere are impacted with modern and digital skills. Thus, Digital sphere do not only avail avenue to promote digital skills but also an avenue where students can practice and sharpen their skills.  Furthermore, the RAT model amplification aspects ensure that utilization of digital learning technology in education increases efficiency, effectiveness and productivity. However, the digital skills are not substitute to the traditional skills but work together to improve on the productivity, sustainability and efficiency. In relation to this argument, the replacement aspects explain that the utilization of the digital learning technology will not change the instructional practices. The technology is providing a different means to the same instructional end.

Increase collaboration and engagement

Digital learning education in universities in Australia has fostered collaboration and communication. This aspect has enables teachers to engage students during lessons and students to communicate with one another. It can be noted that teamwork and communication are essentials attributes that shape a successful professionals. Through, the introduction of digital learning, there is a massive transformation in teaching and learning. Survey has revealed at least 43% of Australian teachers and principals argue that technology improves learning activities and 60% have believed that technology has improved the learning experience of students with disabilities (Tradewind Australia, 2020). In recent times, the integration of technology in the Australian curriculum has been heralded as being able to increase student engagement which is integral in improving academic performance. In the Australian context, the Australian government has recognized engagement in digital learning (Kearney et al., 2020). Students are purported to be engaged when they participate in challenging the learning undertakings and precisely, those that focused on critical thinking and collaboration through digital platforms. Teachers on the other side are expected to use the digital learning platforms to influence student online behavior, orientation, educational goals and discussion topics. Therefore, to improve the e-learning, there must be improvement in e-learning environment, learning interaction and learning design.

Through online lessons and learning games, students have the opportunity to work collectively to solve societal problems. This argument is well explained using the online collaborative learning theory. The online collaborative learning theory enables student with different performance to work together towards a common goal. The students using the digital learning are responsible for each other’s learning and also their personal learning.  Students work together to also solve the ongoing educational challenges using the digital learning platforms. In a nutshell, Hackathons have emerged as an ideal event to find solutions too many challenges. Furthermore, Technology has facilitated one-on-one interaction with teachers despite the geographical distance. Online platforms provide students with the opportunity to ask classroom-relate questions and even seek additional help on subject-related issues that need further clarification (Crawford, 2009). Al-Samarraie et al. (2017) argues that the core factor for a successful e-learning environment is the interaction that should involve both the students and teachers. Further, the vehicle that brings life to digital learning is confined to interactivity. Digital teaching platforms have easy learning activities, precisely, at home students can upload their homework and on the other side, teachers can access and review submitted assignments remotely anywhere. Learning is perceived as an intended outcome of engagement and a precursor to boosting academic performance. According to Zhu (2012) sample population in her study reflected that each member had an opportunity to contribute to group activities during online learning collaboration and in turns help them to achieve more knowledge that those students who studied individually. Thus, the incorporation of technology into student and teacher engagement is a critical factor to improve the learning experience.

New ways of learning

Digital learning has transformed education to the point that teachers can easily create instructional materials to facilitate new ways for students to learn and work collectively. In the contemporary world, there is a wide reach of the internet. Therefore, the ubiquity of small devices can connect to the internet. Furthermore, the school's instrumental designers and educational technologies have device approaches to make the most of the opportunities provided by the technology and progressive changes in education so that it is available to students effectively and efficiently.  To effective implement e-learning as new ways of teaching there is implementation of cognitive load theory. According to David (2015) Cognitive load theory is “the amount of mental effort involved in working memory” during an activity that can be classified into germane, intrinsic and extraneous effort. E-learning theory is casted on the cognitive science principals that demonstrate on the manner of utilization and design of educational technology to improve effective learning. Furthermore, the theory is built based on the cognitive load theory. The cognitive load theory guides the digital learning on the basis of work load. In the narrow view, since an individual working memory has limited capacity and the brain is subjected to distortion from overload if learners are subjected to too much information hence resulting to inefficient learning. It is imperative to maintain balance among these three types of load to promote learning efficiency.

The adoption of e-learning has been enabled on the demand end by accessibility levels of computers and the internet, with more than 60% of the population have used computers and accessing the internet ( Morris et al., 2006). A private research firm argued that by 2001, 67% of Australian internet subscribers  has been on the internet constantly for about two years and more than 83% used the internet a week before the survey ( Gaynzev, 2005). The increase in access to and use of ICT, facilitated by most of the universities in Australia investing in ICT resources have facilitated learning in the digital model. McCann et al. (1998) highlighted the number of factors that may be the cause of the rise in demand for e-learning “the growth of the online economy and the consequent move from old to new economy; the growing demand for skills and ongoing education; the developing global market in education; and, the developing acceptance by teachers of the value of e-learning as a teaching method”. The new ways of learning facilitated by these technologies in universities in Australia enable lecturers to develop a higher level of interaction, improving the understanding of students’ attitudes and behaviors in a more transparent manner.  Therefore, to make the most of the technology opportunities, there has been massive growth and development of the e-environment. E-environment has been upgraded by integration of wide range of digital learning technologies such as development of mobile applications, connection with social media forums and discussion forums and artificial intelligence.  In nutshell, the new way of learning is still improving and in the future it may become the main technique of teaching.

  Changed roles of teachers and learners in a classroom 

 The roles of learners and teachers have changed with the adoption of technology in learning. Traditionally, the role of teachers, similarly to what is depicted in de Valvoline’s illustration, teachers in the classroom were the primary source of information and the students passively received it. The model of the teaching “sage on the stage” has been entrenched in education for a long period and also it is still much in evidence in the contemporary world education curriculum (whitten, 2007). Nevertheless, since the introduction of technology, education has changed its dynamics on accessing information and educational opportunity. Currently in many classrooms, teachers' roles are shifting to the ‘guide on the side’ as learners are taking more responsibility for their learning using the integrated technology to gather relevant information to improve their achievement academically. Many universities across Australia have embraced the revamped education curriculum that focused on redesigning the learning spaces to facilitate new models of education emphasizing more on interaction and collective responsibility and utilization of technology as an enabler. On one side, teachers described comprehensive and multifaceted changes in their teaching roles that include but are not limited to lesson design and materials, pedagogy and even assessment. These changes fundamentally have strong workload implications. Although, the majority of the teachers considered workload demands so challenging; technology, especially during the COVID-19 period help in easing the workload (Oliviera et al., 2021). With teaching roles adjusting, most of the teachers have reported that they value the opportunity availed by technology to learn and implement new IT skills, platforms and activities. On the other hand, for students, digital platforms provide a better way of approaching their learning role. Precisely, during covid-19 higher schools in Australia ceased face-to-face learning and instead adopt digital learning. Unlike in the in-person classroom where most of the research work was conducted by the teachers, in online learning students were required to intensify their research work a prerequisite for tackling assignments and effective participation in the group discussions. 

 

 

Conclusion

Australian higher-education education curriculum is currently undergoing significant changes that will affect the future. Amongst the changes is the incorporation of technology in the curriculum. Arguably, technology is changing the dynamics of every sector from business to education. Thus, with technology fully incorporated into the education sector, the sector is bound to experience massive transformation. Currently, technology is only partially included in the education sector. However, they are drastic changes already experienced associated with partial integration. Digital education promotes the skills and abilities prerequisite for an individual to be successful and effectively traversing. The skills are not meant to replace traditional skills, such as woodwork skills but only complement them and improve efficiency. The education transformation has been slowly since some of the education sector stakeholders have been reluctant to embrace new technology. However, the unprecedented outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic increases the speed of embracing technology in education because digital learning was the only mitigation strategy to deal with the lockdown. In a nutshell, though technology has transformed and improved education in Australian higher schools, some areas need to be improved.  Therefore, this essay recommends the following ways that will maximize on the digital learning opportunities:-

The development of better assessment tools will be a necessity to deal with the problem and help in improving the quality of digital education.

With the complexity of managing time and heavy workload, many students become unmotivated concerning their studies hence facing the risk of poor performance academically, therefore, digital learning should ensure appropriate workload to students.

With a poor internet connection, universities students in Australia will unable to access electronic materials easily and effectively, In turn, it makes some of the students unmotivated to engage themselves in online libraries. Thus, improving on the internet connectivity will enhance accessibility of digital libraries.

 

References

 

Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2017). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education43(11), 2003–2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088

Crawford, R. (2009). An Australian Perspective: Technology in Higher School Music. Journal of Historical Research in Music Education30(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/153660060903000205

Gaynzev, E. G. (2015). SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE INTERNET ADDICTION. Historical and Social-Educational Ideas7(6/1), 116–118. https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2015-7-6/1-116-118

Everitt, L., Green, B., & Pianca, E. (2014). Australian Design and Technology Education at a 21st Century Crossroads. In ERIC. Australian Association for Research in Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED596752

Harju, V., Koskinen, A., & Pehkonen, L. (2019). An exploration of longitudinal studies of digital learning. Educational Research, 61(4), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1660586

 

Kearney, S., & Maakrun, J. (2020). Let’s Get Engaged: The Nexus between Digital Technologies, Engagement and Learning. Education Sciences10(12), 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120357

Morgan, D. (2009). Teaching and learning has always been a highly social activity. Technology hasn’t changed this. Or has it. In Learning Technologies Conference, 1.

Morris, A., Goodman, J., & Brading, H. (2006). Internet use and non-use: views of older users. Universal Access in the Information Society6(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0057-5

Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology52(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112

Onyema, E. M., Eucheria, N. C., Obafemi, F. A., Sen, S., Atonye, F. G., Sharma, A., & Alsayed, A. O. (2020). Impact of Coronavirus Pandemic on Education. Journal of Education and Practice11(13), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/11-13-12

Tradewind Australia. (2020, August). The Impact of Technology on Learning and How to Drive Student Engagement. Www.twrecruitment.com.au. https://www.twrecruitment.com.au/blog/2020/08/the-impact-of-technology-on-learning-and-how-to-drive-student-engagement?source=google.com

Stone, C. (2019). Online learning in Australian higher education: Opportunities, challenges and transformations. Student Success, 10(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i2.1299

Whetten, D. A. (2007). Principles of Effective Course Design: What I Wish I Had Known About Learning-Centered Teaching 30 Years Ago. Journal of Management Education31(3), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562906298445

Williams, P. J. (1993). Technology education in Australia. International Journal of Technology and Design Education3(3), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00183707

Winter, M., Pryss, R., Probst, T., & Reichert, M. (2019). Learning to read by Learning to Write – An Evaluation of a Serious Game to Foster Business Process Model Comprehension (Preprint). JMIR Serious Games123(1234). https://doi.org/10.2196/15374

WHOLE SCHOOL APPROACH AND GENDER VIOLENCE-BASED

 

Introduction

Fundamentally, all children deserve a school environment that is tranquil and safe. The environment will permit them to grow, express their potential and take full advantage of their skills and abilities. However, a reasonable number of students are facing a different day-to-day basis exposure to gender-based violence.  The exposure is via both explicit and implicit forms that enormously affect children’s social interests and academic endeavors. This study, therefore, sought to explore gender-based violence using the evidence-based mechanism, the whole school approach. A whole school approach refers to mitigating strategies that work at multiple tiers, at the school and community, for preventing and responding to gender-based violence. In the narrow view, effective whole-school approaches deal with a range of spheres simultaneously. They include but are not limited to the school environment, culture and pedagogical mechanisms.

The study premise is engulfed in eight minimum standards elements to establish a safe, gender-responsive and all-inclusive school environment. These are 1) top-notch school leadership and community engagement; 2) creation and implementation of a code of conduct; 3) capacity building of the teachers and teaching staff; 4) creating children's awareness on knowledge of child rights, participation and dealing with gender inequality; 5) enhancing reporting, managing and accountability; 6) Dealing with incidents; 7) improving conditions of the physical environment and 8) improving engagement with parents.  The report further uses whole-school approach evidence-based based on the four perspectives: comprehensive-health, three-tier model, social-ecological and strength-based perspective.

The paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction. The second part expounds more on gender-based violence with the support of data. The third part is the rationale underpins of the whole approach and its prevention strategies.  The implications of school responses to gender-based violence constitute the fourth part. Part five and the concluding part is the report conclusion.

 Gender based violence

GBV can be defined “as acts or threats of sexual, physical, or psychological violence occurring in and around school, perpetrated as a result of gender norms and stereotypes, and enforced by unequal power dynamic” (Unesco et al.,  2016). The phenomenon impacts negatively on the lives of millions of children globally.  Although the research on school-based gender based violence is limited, data indicates that the students and teachers experience extensive physical, sexual and emotional abuse within the school surrounding. Precisely, genders, teachers and students can be victims and the perpetrators of this phenomenon and it can result in serious and long-term consequences (Unesco, 2016).  Gender based violence wears many faces. They include but are not limited to gang undertakings, personal items theft, bullying and intimidation, use of dangerous objects and guns and verbally abuse.

Although much of the scale and scope of the GBV in schools remain concealed, the available data on violence against students that include but are not limited to bullying and physical violence, allow this report to build a partial, despite fragmented, picture of the pervasive nature of GBV in learning’s institutions. According to research by Plan International (2013), nearly 0.25 billion children world wise are suffering from school-based violence yearly. In some European countries such as France, 40% of the students have complained of cyber bullying (Menesini et al., 2014).   Another research indicates in Zambia, 61% of the children have reported bullying on the monthly basis (Fleming and Jacobsen, 2010). Unesco (2016) reports that more than one million children in school suffer from physical violence under the pretext of discipline: 50% of all children globally live in countries where there is weak or no legal protection from corporal punishment.

Research has indicated gender-based violence is promoted by numerous factors. To begin with, schools located longer distance serves as disincentives to schooling and catalyst GBV. According to Suleman et al. (2013) distance from the school in most cases is affecting girls' schooling. Furthermore, they are more cases of school girls being raped by their male counterparts, or members of the community and even cases of disappearing (Small et al., 1993).  The second factor is media which is associated with students’ exposure to a violent culture. Notably, most young people learn violent behaviors through observation.  Media also provide a dimension that exposes students to sexual behavior mostly through pornographic. Therefore, it has an impact on increasing the cases of rape and other forms of gender-based violence.

 Evidence-informed responses

The prevention of gender-based violence in the community and school-based is through the provision of the impetus to develop the guidance premises at strengthening gender responsiveness to make the learning environment safe. Furthermore, it provides an evidence-based framework for action that guides policymakers and practitioners to design the best mitigation strategies. We have learned a great deal about the integration of an evidence-based whole school approach in responding to gender-based violence.  The monitoring, evaluation and learning strategy applies to a gender transformative approach in paradigm shifts in attitudes and behaviors among all stakeholders.

The perspective includes comprehensive school health, strength-based, social-ecological systems and three-tiered planning.

Figure 1 evidence based

Prevention from the minimum standards

 Based on the eight minimum standards, the prevention is executed in the following ways.

 

Strengthening of the school and community leadership

The support and leadership of school and community governing organs are imperative in encouraging undertakings that create a culture of non-violence and respect in society. Strong leadership in all dimensions plays a vital role in ensuring all the codes of conduct are implemented, reporting and the incidents response mechanisms are seamlessly monitored and execution of the appropriate and necessary actions are. An effective code of conduct forms the fertile ground that creates a sense of shared ownership and responsibility for ensuring a non-violence learning environment. Also, it increases accountability and indicates the approach to reporting and addressing misconduct.

School leadership is responsible for coordinating with community authority on the monitoring and budget-based issues within the school vicinity, and is an important part of the implementation of a whole school approach (UN women, 2016). Precisely, successful policy implementation in school requires full support from all the stakeholders such as the education authorities, community leaders and the teachers receiving training. In other words, school principals, teachers, students and even parents work collectively to develop the approach and respond to cases of gender-based violence. Consequently, local entities such as the police and other organizations partner with the school to develop and respond to incidents of gender-based violence. Furthermore, these engagements are associated with the creation of referral paths and the promotion of safe schools.

Engagement with parents and communities 

Ensuring the success of the whole school approach to gender-based violence requires robust practices of consulting with the stakeholders, Involvement of the school community is salient for gaining their support. The aspect is particularly significant for responding to intense abuse and violence to safeguard the students against gender-based violence. (UNICEF, 2009), making parents and the school community part of the discussion against gender-based violence has the ripple effect of creating opportunities to directly address the disdain issues embedded in GBV. Therefore, the parents and community are involved in school to keep the students safe. The discussion on the role of social norms and societal inequality forms the ground for understanding violence (Parkes, 2020). According to Crabble et al. (2012), although schools may be creating a safe learning environment, gendered attitudes in the community need to be accounted for. Therefore, school-building alliances with members of the communities help broaden the salient dialogue on students’ wellbeing.

Furthermore, to prevent gender-based violence, parents are expected to use positive parenting and discipline techniques. Corporal punishment is a challenging space that requires drastic changes. Phiri et al. (2015), there is need to review the sphere of corporal changes, since the school may be supporting child-friendly values, and parents and the communities may be regarding corporal punishment as a discipline instilling mechanism. Thus positive disciplinary methods are achievable through discussions between the school and the community meetings. These meetings avail platforms where the parents and teachers provide their perspectives on both corporal punishment and positive discipline. According to Mugadza et al. (2019), it is important to have forums to discuss the reasons fuelling corporal punishment is widespread in the community. These forums also should form the ground for the community to be encouraged to contribute to the development of positive discipline practices in the community.

Evidence based-responses
 the paper focuses on two perspectives.  To begin with, the comprehensive school health backbone is on the planning of the student's well-being and school safety.  It recognizes that healthy young people are well designed to achieve, especially academically. The whole school curriculum approach to addressing gender-based violence; takes appropriate action in all junctures of students’ schooling.  Therefore, creating awareness of gender-based violence through cumulative lessons helps students in their quest to identify, discuss, report and address the incidents of violence against their peers and friends (Wilson, 2015). Among the approaches is the integration of children's rights into the curricula.  Through teaching and learning, children understand to have inherent capabilities as well as rights and responsibilities which should be respected and promoted. In a nutshell, the school curriculum discusses the rights and responsibilities of students and educators for the protection and to promote non-violence learning environments.

 

The second perspective is the three-tier model that offers a framework to identify evidence regarding the strengths, needs and priorities. The framework should offer both proactive and responsive practices.  They are divided into three tiers: primary, secondary and tertiary.   Since the report is dealing with a high level of gender-based violence; the emphasis will be on the secondary and tertiary tiers.  In the secondary, the implementation of the response and prevent gender-based violence is through the provision of early intervention and support.  The intervention is executed collectively to take less time, lessen the impact and enable sustainability in coordinated programs. On the tertiary tier, the execution is through focusing on minimizing the immediate effect of gender-based violence on the victims. For instance, building the capacity of teachers and the community to the point stakeholders feel more equipped to take the risk needed in handling sensitive issues such as gender-based violence (Parkes, 2020). In particular, it is significant in engaging with students and communicating with the community about sticky topics such as bullying and sexual harassment.   

 The social ecological emphasizes the importance of connection and the community.

Therefore, schools under this pretext create a sense of belonging and help to develop students' social, emotional and physiological well-being.  Therefore, the concept is integral to prevention of the gender-based violence since it builds the foundation of caring that will support the problem-solving process in case of GBV. Furthermore, connection creates a sense of belonging hence developing positive relationships and communicating support to resolve incidents of GBV.

 

 

 

Figure 2 Social-ecological system perspective

 Finally, it is the strength-based practices perspectives confined to a belief system with partnership processes and as well practices that empower individuals by building on their potential and provision of a supportive environment.   Responding with restorative rather than harsh disciplinary practices such as corporal punishment is ideal for creating a positive learning environment free from violence. Furthermore, integration of the positive behavior supports creates a calm and safe environment.

 

Implications of the research

 Sustain a positive school environment in most cases is driven by the school authorities and it can be disrupted by job transfers or inadequate resources.  Therefore, for effective implementation of the whole schooling approach is salient for the school administrator to lobby for enough resources from the authorities for successful projects. Some of the resources are prerequisites for hiring school counselors and psychologists, organizing meetings with the community and building more facilities.  Through strength-based practices, there is the integration of social and emotional learning.  Thus, the stakeholders can have emotional competencies in terms of self-awareness, self-management, social awareness and relationship skills.  According to Lisandra et al. (2016) social-based strength improves students' behavioral adjustment in terms of increased social behaviors and improves overall academic performance.  Therefore, this paper, recommends that school administrators have worked closely with the education authorities at all levels to ensure that the school-level project has enough resources and is monitored.

Monitoring undertakings and evaluation of the effectiveness of the whole school approaches can be a challenge since there are multiple pathways of change occurring. In effect, it has resulted in limited evidence based on the implementation of the approaches.  According to Belot et al. (2018), it is recommended that learning institutions develop a robust and long-term prevention plan that addresses the issue of gender-based violence. Furthermore, the three-tiered health framework provides the framework to address gender-based violence within the set of behavioral and academic concerns. Therefore, this paper recommends that the school and the community should invest in the monitoring, accountability methods and collection of the relevant data on the approach that is contributing to the reduction of violence and it is sustained.

The whole school approach model requires many stakeholders and activities.  This nature makes it complex to implement and hence requires a sophisticated process to ensure its success.  Therefore, it should be routine for all these stakeholders to work together within management committees and other groups involving parents and teachers.  Working together as per comprehensive healthy perspectives fosters a healthy relationship. Therefore, this paper recommends that the implementation of a whole school approach should be tailored to the needs and priorities identified by the school and the community. Research has suggested that rather than having a sole focus on ending just one gender-based violence, it is imperative to create a caring and respectful school environment and positive results that include but are not limited to emotional well-being and social wellbeing. Furthermore, these environments are attributed to the provision of the critical context for shaping students’ self-esteem, self-efficacy and high level of self-control over their lives. Furthermore, there should be strengthening of the school system to prevent and respond to gender-based violence. Therefore, the identification of students needs mental and other helpful services to help them plus their families to find the appropriate services.

Conclusion

In a nutshell implementation of the whole school approach in addressing gender-based violence, success is confirmed by the reduced number of victims of gender-based violence. In other words, there should be few cases of gender-based violence reported. This is achievable through a good relationship between the stakeholders. All the parties should actively contribute to strengthening initiatives and policies aiding to respond and preventing gender-based violence. Furthermore, a successful implementation means that there is an adaptation of initiatives that directly reduce gender-based violence such as using other disciplinary action rather than corporal punishment. These positive disciplinary methods ensure that students are availed easy schooling time without being subjected to any unwanted action.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Belot, M., & Fafchamps, M. (2018). Are People Equally Other-Regarding When Selecting a Match Versus Choosing an Allocation? Southern Economic Journal84(4), 1088–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12267

 Crabbe, M., & Flood, M. (2021). School-Based Education to Address Pornography’s Influence on Young People: A Proposed Practice Framework. American Journal of Sexuality Education16(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2020.1856744

Dillon, J. (2012). No place for bullying: Leadership for Schools That Care for every student. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335322

Fleming, L. C., & Jacobsen, K. H. (2009). Bullying among middle-school students in low and middle income countries. Health Promotion International25(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap046

Lizandra, J., Devís-Devís, J., Pérez-Gimeno, E., Valencia-Peris, A., & Peiró-Velert, C. (2016). Does Sedentary Behavior Predict Academic Performance in Adolescents or the Other Way Round? A Longitudinal Path Analysis. PLOS ONE11(4), e0153272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153272

 

Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Palladino, B. E., & Pini, S. (2014). Il ciclo della violenza: maltrattamento familiare, bullismo e dating aggression psicologico. MALTRATTAMENTO E ABUSO ALL’INFANZIA3, 29–46. https://doi.org/10.3280/mal2014-003003

Mugadza, H. T., Mujeyi, B., Stout, B., Wali, N., & Renzaho, A. M. N. (2019). Childrearing Practices Among Sub-Saharan African Migrants in Australia: a Systematic Review. Journal of Child and Family Studies28(11), 2927–2941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01463-z

Parkes, J., Ross, F. J., & Heslop, J. (2020). The ebbs and flows of policy enactments on school-related gender-based violence: Insights from Ethiopia, Zambia, Côte d’Ivoire and Togo. International Journal of Educational Development72, 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102133

Plan International. (2013, December). REPORT OF THE UN OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ON PREVENTING AND ELIMINATING CHILD, EARLY AND FORCED MARRIAGE. Plan International. Retrieved October 5, 2022, from https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Women/WRGS/ForcedMarriage/NGO/PlanInternational2.pdf

Phiri, M. A., & Pillay, N. (2015). A STUDY ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ORIENTATION PROCESS AND CROSS-CULTURAL TRAINING FOR THE EXPATRIATE. Journal of Governance and Regulation4(4). https://doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v4_i4_c4_p13

 

Small, S. A., & Kerns, D. (1993). Unwanted Sexual Activity among Peers during Early and Middle Adolescence: Incidence and Risk Factors. Journal of Marriage and the Family55(4), 941. https://doi.org/10.2307/352774

Suleman, Q., Aslam, H. D., Habib, M. B., & Hussain, Dr. I. (2013). Effectiveness of Educational Technology in Strengthening Student’s Achievement in English at Secondary School Level in Kohat Division (Pakistan). International Journal of Learning and Development3(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v3i1.3154

UNESCO & UN Women. (2016). Global Guidance on Addressing School-Related Gender-Based Violence. Paris: UNESCO

‌ Wilson, J. W. (2005). Building your patientsʼ trust begins in the reception area. The Hearing Journal58(7), 36. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hj.0000286419.45462.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Conflict Between the Early Stuart Kings and Parliament: A Historical Analysis

  THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE EARLY STUARTS KINGS AND PARLIAMENT         The Stuarts are recognized as the first kings of the U.K. Among th...